I responded few days ago to a query on the BoardSource LinkedIn
discussion group concerning what people thought the appropriate length of terms
and term limits should be. This is what I said:
“There is a principle regarding one’s vision,
when on a board, (and commitment to it) that a person's vision usually does not
extend beyond their expected likelihood of being around. Six years create a
very short memory and learning span. The usual reasons for advocating short
limits don't hold water, including the "new blood" argument. We say,
"Good ones (that we just lost due a limit) can come back on the board
after the year off." but they don't. They are snatched up by another board
or lose their interest. (I've served on 30 or more boards). If you are deeply
attached to the idea of term limits, do what an excellent hospital board that I
served on did - make it 12 or 15 years. That permits grooming of board
leadership through committee service, committee chairmanship, officership, etc.
There is still plenty of coming and going, by the way, simply due to life's
vicissitudes. Getting new blood is a non-issue.
Creating a two term limit automatically creates nothing but freshman and lame ducks, be it city councils, county councils, legislatures, or boards.”
The “expert” advisors responding to this LinkedIn group discussion seemed, in the main,
to be married to the idea of a limit of 2 terms of three or four years. My view
is that term limits (not terms), especially single digits, more likely damage
board performance for a number of reasons, and my comments addressed a couple
of those. I wanted the readers to think more critically about their instinctive
mantra of term limits. A couple did, but most continued to circle thoughtlessly
around a two term limit in spite of its foolishness. It is such a popular idea
that it is hard to think otherwise, even when the illogic and imprudence of it
is staring you in the face.
Now if you are not interested in
optimizing board decision-making, but have another trumping priority such as affording
a lot of association members a chance to serve on the board, then admit it, and
worry less about board performance. This latter priority will drive the
organization toward being a staff driven board and organization. We have all
been there.
No comments:
Post a Comment