An important principle of board governance, Policy
Governance included, is that when trust in the CEO's performance is low, monitoring in some form is
ramped up. The Policy Governance board’s values, and hence its policies, don’t
change, but frequency and immediacy of monitoring increases. This behavior occurs
typically under two conditions: a newly hired chief executive (whose competence
is not yet demonstrated), and secondly, where there is a growing concern about compliance
concerning a specific policy.
The former situation might result in monitoring those
policies indicative of the health of organizational culture and of financial
performance. They tend to be more directly and immediately impacted by the
executive’s behavior in the first case and his grasp of financial leadership in
the second, competencies of which the board needs early reassurance.
If the board is not a Policy Governance board, a board
style typically reflective of low trust will result—questioning and probing
increases and becomes more intense (often coupled with advice). This dynamic
does not necessarily reveal the board members’ underlying values (which may
vary between them, but never expressed) nor why the particular questions are
being asked, reasons which the CEO must infer.
A board’s careful, more frequent monitoring of a
new CEO is appropriate, but as demonstration of competence and reliability grows, monitoring frequency can be backed off to an annual frequency (except
for financial management indicators).
No comments:
Post a Comment